DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Renault Scenic vs 2018 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModelCX-3
2018Model year2018
MinivanBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
193 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1749 ccEngine displacement1759 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
300 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank48 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/55 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4275 mm
1866 mmWidth1765 mm
1660/1655 mmHeight1535 mm
1725/1753 KgWeight1243-1295 Kg
2804 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Renault Scenic and 2018 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…