DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Mazda CX-3 vs 2018 Holden Barina Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHolden
CX-3ModelBarina
2018Model year2018
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1759 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
115 HPPower116 HP
270 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank46 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength—
1765 mmWidth—
1535 mmHeight—
1243-1295 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Mazda CX-3 and 2018 Holden Barina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…