1996 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0i 16V 4WD (125 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Volkswagen Passat Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Volkswagen
Passat
Volkswagen Passat 1.9 TDI Syncro (110 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolkswagen Passat
MazdaMakeVolkswagen
CronosModelPassat
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolkswagen Passat
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
173 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolkswagen Passat
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolkswagen Passat
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationVolkswagen Passat
4695 mmLength4670 mm
1770 mmWidth1740 mm
1400 mmHeight1460 mm
1260 KgWeight1395 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…