DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Peugeot 605 vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeMazda
605ModelCronos
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
141 HPPower125 HP
225 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4695 mm
1799 mmWidth1770 mm
1417 mmHeight1400 mm
1430 KgWeight1260 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Peugeot 605 and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…