DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volkswagen Passat vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
PassatModelCronos
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
235 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4695 mm
1740 mmWidth1770 mm
1460 mmHeight1400 mm
1395 KgWeight1260 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volkswagen Passat and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…