1996 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0i 16V 4WD (125 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Peugeot 605 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Peugeot
605
Peugeot 605 2.0 Turbo (141 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationPeugeot 605
MazdaMakePeugeot
CronosModel605
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationPeugeot 605
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
192 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
125 HPPower141 HP
173 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationPeugeot 605
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationPeugeot 605
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 HTyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationPeugeot 605
4695 mmLength4765 mm
1770 mmWidth1799 mm
1400 mmHeight1417 mm
1260 KgWeight1430 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Peugeot 605 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…