1996 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0i 16V 4WD (125 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 Turbo (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationCitroen XM
MazdaMakeCitroen
CronosModelXM
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationCitroen XM
—0–100 km/h9,3 s
192 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
125 HPPower147 HP
173 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,0 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationCitroen XM
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 HTyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationCitroen XM
4695 mmLength4708 mm
1770 mmWidth1794 mm
1400 mmHeight1394 mm
1260 KgWeight1401 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…