DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CronosSpecificationAudi A3
MazdaMakeAudi
CronosModelA3
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Mazda CronosSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
161 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
82 HPPower90 HP
182 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CronosSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CronosSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CronosSpecificationAudi A3
4695 mmLength4152 mm
1770 mmWidth1735 mm
1400 mmHeight1427 mm
1260 KgWeight1170 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…