1996 • Toyota
Carina
Toyota Carina 2.0 DT (90 HP) 1996Overall Score57.5/100
1996 Toyota Carina vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 2.0 D (82 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CarinaSpecificationMazda Cronos
ToyotaMakeMazda
CarinaModelCronos
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Toyota CarinaSpecificationMazda Cronos
0 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1975 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
203 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CarinaSpecificationMazda Cronos
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CarinaSpecificationMazda Cronos
4495 mmLength4695 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1410 mmHeight1400 mm
1130 KgWeight1260 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Toyota Carina and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…