DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A3 vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Cronos
AudiMakeMazda
A3ModelCronos
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Cronos
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
181 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
202 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Cronos
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Cronos
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationMazda Cronos
4152 mmLength4695 mm
1735 mmWidth1770 mm
1427 mmHeight1400 mm
1170 KgWeight1260 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A3 and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…