DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo 850 vs 1996 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMazda
850ModelCronos
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
4+1Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

240 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
143 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque157 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4695 mm
—Width1770 mm
—Height1400 mm
—Weight1170 Kg
—Wheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo 850 and 1996 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…