DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CronosModelGalant
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
157 NmTorque179 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4630 mm
1770 mmWidth1740 mm
1400 mmHeight1415 mm
1170 KgWeight1260 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…