1996 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 1.8i V6 24V (140 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Honda Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Honda
Integra
Honda Integra 1.8 i (180 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationHonda Integra
MazdaMakeHonda
CronosModelIntegra
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationHonda Integra
—0–100 km/h7,0 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1797 cc
140 HPPower180 HP
157 NmTorque175 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationHonda Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationHonda Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationHonda Integra
4695 mmLength4380 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1335 mm
1170 KgWeight1200 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Honda Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…