1996 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 1.8i V6 24V (140 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Mazda Cronos vs 1996 Eagle Talon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Eagle
Talon
Eagle Talon 2.0 i 16V TSi (210 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CronosSpecificationEagle Talon
MazdaMakeEagle
CronosModelTalon
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda CronosSpecificationEagle Talon
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
140 HPPower210 HP
157 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CronosSpecificationEagle Talon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CronosSpecificationEagle Talon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size205/55 R16V
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CronosSpecificationEagle Talon
4695 mmLength4374 mm
1770 mmWidth1735 mm
1400 mmHeight1295 mm
1170 KgWeight1252 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2509 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mazda Cronos and 1996 Eagle Talon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…