DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda Cronos vs 1994 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
CronosModelXM
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
195 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower145 HP
157 NmTorque226 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 89 STyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4710 mm
1770 mmWidth1795 mm
1400 mmHeight1385 mm
1170 KgWeight1400 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda Cronos and 1994 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…