1994 • Caterham
21
Caterham 21 1.8 i 16V U347WC (153 Hp) 1994Overall Score61.5/100
1994 Caterham 21 vs 1994 Mazda Cronos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Mazda
Cronos
Mazda Cronos 1.8i V6 24V (140 Hp) 1994Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Cronos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda Cronos
CaterhamMakeMazda
21ModelCronos
1994Model year1994
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda Cronos
5,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
153 HPPower140 HP
180 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda Cronos
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda Cronos
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Caterham 21SpecificationMazda Cronos
3800 mmLength4695 mm
1580 mmWidth1770 mm
1150 mmHeight1400 mm
650 KgWeight1170 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Caterham 21 and 1994 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…