DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Citroen XM vs 1994 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XMModelCronos
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
212 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
145 HPPower140 HP
226 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4695 mm
1795 mmWidth1770 mm
1385 mmHeight1400 mm
1400 KgWeight1170 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Citroen XM and 1994 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…