DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda BT-50 vs 2008 Toyota Alphard Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Alphard

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
BT-50ModelAlphard
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
158 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2362 cc
143 HPPower159 HP
330 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4865 mm
1805 mmWidth1830 mm
1750 mmHeight1935 mm
1940 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda BT-50 and 2008 Toyota Alphard approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Alphard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…