DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Toyota Alphard vs 2008 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Alphard

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
AlphardModelBT-50
2008Model year2008
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
160 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2362 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
159 HPPower143 HP
220 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
14 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
12 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength5075 mm
1830 mmWidth1805 mm
1935 mmHeight1750 mm
—Weight1940 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Toyota Alphard and 2008 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Alphard leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…