DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Opel Antara vs 2008 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMazda
AntaraModelBT-50
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2405 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
220 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength5075 mm
1850 mmWidth1805 mm
1704 mmHeight1750 mm
—Weight1940 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Opel Antara and 2008 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…