DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda BT-50 vs 2008 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOpel
BT-50ModelAntara
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
158 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2405 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
330 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4575 mm
1805 mmWidth1850 mm
1750 mmHeight1704 mm
1940 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda BT-50 and 2008 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…