DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mazda BT-50 vs 2008 Landwind SUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda BT-50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLandwind
BT-50ModelSUV
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
158 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2800 cc
143 HPPower92 HP
330 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4800 mm
1805 mmWidth1800 mm
1750 mmHeight1750 mm
1940 KgWeight1935 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mazda BT-50 and 2008 Landwind SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda BT-50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…