DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda BT-50 vs 2006 Kia Carnival Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
BT-50ModelCarnival
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
158 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
330 NmTorque224 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4925 mm
1805 mmWidth1900 mm
1750 mmHeight1735 mm
1940 KgWeight1915 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2905 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda BT-50 and 2006 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…