2006 • Chrysler
Sebring
Chrysler Sebring 2.4 i 16V (152 Hp) 2006Overall Score63.25/100
2006 Chrysler Sebring vs 2006 Mazda BT-50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Mazda
BT-50
Mazda BT-50 2.5 TD (143 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Chrysler Sebring
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMazda BT-50
ChryslerMakeMazda
SebringModelBT-50
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMazda BT-50
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
152 HPPower143 HP
226 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMazda BT-50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMazda BT-50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chrysler SebringSpecificationMazda BT-50
4845 mmLength5075 mm
1790 mmWidth1805 mm
1395 mmHeight1750 mm
1490 KgWeight1940 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Chrysler Sebring and 2006 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Sebring leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…