DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Carnival vs 2006 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
CarnivalModelBT-50
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,8 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
224 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4925 mmLength5075 mm
1900 mmWidth1805 mm
1735 mmHeight1750 mm
1915 KgWeight1940 Kg
2905 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Carnival and 2006 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…