DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda BT-50 vs 2006 Chrysler Sebring Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Sebring

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChrysler
BT-50ModelSebring
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
158 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
143 HPPower152 HP
330 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4845 mm
1805 mmWidth1790 mm
1750 mmHeight1395 mm
1940 KgWeight1490 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda BT-50 and 2006 Chrysler Sebring approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Sebring leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…