2004 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2004Overall Score69.25/100
2004 Mazda Atenza vs 2005 Saab 9-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 2.3 t (185 Hp) 2005Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationSaab 9-5
MazdaMakeSaab
AtenzaModel9-5
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationSaab 9-5
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
180 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
178 HPPower185 HP
216 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationSaab 9-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationSaab 9-5
4745 mmLength4827 mm
1780 mmWidth1792 mm
1440 mmHeight1475 mm
1340 KgWeight1715 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2703 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda Atenza and 2005 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…