DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mazda Atenza vs 2004 Mazda Atenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Atenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
AtenzaModelAtenza
2005Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
175 HPPower178 HP
220 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank64 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/45 R17 87 VTyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4745 mm
1780 mmWidth1780 mm
1435 mmHeight1440 mm
1355 KgWeight1340 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mazda Atenza and 2004 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…