DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi A6 vs 2004 Mazda Atenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

69.75–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationMazda Atenza
AudiMakeMazda
A6ModelAtenza
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationMazda Atenza
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
163 HPPower178 HP
310 NmTorque216 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationMazda Atenza
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationMazda Atenza
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/55 R17Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationMazda Atenza
4810 mmLength4745 mm
1852 mmWidth1780 mm
1551 mmHeight1440 mm
1815 KgWeight1340 Kg
2757 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi A6 and 2004 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…