DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Atenza vs 2004 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

69.25–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda AtenzaSpecificationAudi A6
MazdaMakeAudi
AtenzaModelA6
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda AtenzaSpecificationAudi A6
—0–100 km/h10,4 s
180 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
178 HPPower163 HP
216 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda AtenzaSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda AtenzaSpecificationAudi A6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda AtenzaSpecificationAudi A6
4745 mmLength4810 mm
1780 mmWidth1852 mm
1440 mmHeight1551 mm
1340 KgWeight1815 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2757 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Atenza and 2004 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…