DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Atenza vs 2004 Acura TSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Atenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAcura
AtenzaModelTSX
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
178 HPPower203 HP
216 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4657 mm
1780 mmWidth1762 mm
1440 mmHeight1456 mm
1340 KgWeight1495 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Atenza and 2004 Acura TSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…