2002 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
2002 Mazda Atenza vs 2002 Volvo S80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 i T (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S80
MazdaMakeVolvo
AtenzaModelS80
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h7,9 s
180 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
178 HPPower200 HP
216 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S80
4745 mmLength4822 mm
1780 mmWidth1832 mm
1440 mmHeight1434 mm
1340 KgWeight1495 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2791 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda Atenza and 2002 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…