2002 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.4 (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Volvo S60 vs 2002 Mazda Atenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda Atenza
VolvoMakeMazda
S60ModelAtenza
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda Atenza
8,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
200 HPPower178 HP
285 NmTorque216 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda Atenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda Atenza
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationMazda Atenza
4576 mmLength4745 mm
1804 mmWidth1780 mm
1428 mmHeight1440 mm
1440 KgWeight1340 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Volvo S60 and 2002 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…