2002 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2.4 i 20V (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
2002 Volvo C70 vs 2002 Mazda Atenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C70SpecificationMazda Atenza
VolvoMakeMazda
C70ModelAtenza
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Volvo C70SpecificationMazda Atenza
8,5 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
200 HPPower178 HP
285 NmTorque216 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C70SpecificationMazda Atenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C70SpecificationMazda Atenza
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C70SpecificationMazda Atenza
4716 mmLength4745 mm
1817 mmWidth1780 mm
1429 mmHeight1440 mm
1570 KgWeight1340 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Volvo C70 and 2002 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…