2002 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
2002 Mazda Atenza vs 2002 Volvo S60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.4 (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S60
MazdaMakeVolvo
AtenzaModelS60
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S60
—0–100 km/h8,1 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
178 HPPower200 HP
216 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationVolvo S60
4745 mmLength4576 mm
1780 mmWidth1804 mm
1440 mmHeight1428 mm
1340 KgWeight1440 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2715 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda Atenza and 2002 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…