2002 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
2002 Mazda Atenza vs 2002 Opel Astra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Opel
Astra
Opel Astra 2.0 16V T OPC (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationOpel Astra
MazdaMakeOpel
AtenzaModelAstra
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationOpel Astra
—0–100 km/h7,8 s
180 km/hTop speed231 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
178 HPPower200 HP
216 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationOpel Astra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption12,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationOpel Astra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size215/40 ZR 17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationOpel Astra
4745 mmLength4288 mm
1780 mmWidth1710 mm
1440 mmHeight1510 mm
1340 KgWeight1340 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2611 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda Atenza and 2002 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…