2002 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2002Overall Score69.25/100
2002 Mazda Atenza vs 2002 Holden Astra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Holden
Astra
Holden Astra 2.0 i 16V Turbo (200 Hp) 2002Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHolden Astra
MazdaMakeHolden
AtenzaModelAstra
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHolden Astra
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
178 HPPower200 HP
216 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHolden Astra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size175/80 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHolden Astra
4745 mmLength4252 mm
1780 mmWidth1709 mm
1440 mmHeight1425 mm
1340 KgWeight1282 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2606 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda Atenza and 2002 Holden Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…