DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mazda 929 vs 1990 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 940
MazdaMakeVolvo
929Model940
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 940
—0–100 km/h10,2 s
181 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2316 cc
127 HPPower155 HP
188 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 940
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/70 R14 91 STyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 940
4690 mmLength4871 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1427 mmHeight1425 mm
1300 KgWeight—
2710 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mazda 929 and 1990 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…