DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 929
AudiMakeMazda
80Model929
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 929
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
132 HPPower127 HP
190 NmTorque188 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 929
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 929
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size195/70 R14 91 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 929
4478 mmLength4690 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1427 mm
1290 KgWeight1300 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…