DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Toyota Estima vs 1990 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
EstimaModel929
1990Model year1990
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2438 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
132 HPPower127 HP
204 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
215 / 65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14 91 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4690 mm
1800 mmWidth1695 mm
1780 mmHeight1427 mm
1730 KgWeight1300 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Toyota Estima and 1990 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…