DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 100 vs 1990 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 929

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
AudiMakeMazda
100Model929
1990Model year1990
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
138 HPPower110 HP
188 NmTorque168 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 929
4793 mmLength4690 mm
1814 mmWidth1695 mm
1421 mmHeight1425 mm
1400 KgWeight1470 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 100 and 1990 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 929 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…