DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 626 vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
MazdaMakeAudi
626Model80
1994Model year1994
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
10,2 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
182 km/hTop speed174 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
180 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 88 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 80
4600 mmLength4482 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1465 mmHeight1406 mm
1230 KgWeight1270 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 626 and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…