DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 80 vs 1994 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
AudiMakeMazda
80Model626
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
14,1 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
174 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
182 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 88 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
4482 mmLength4600 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1406 mmHeight1465 mm
1270 KgWeight1230 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 80 and 1994 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…