DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Fiat Croma vs 1994 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
FiatMakeMazda
CromaModel626
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
180 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
94 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
6 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14 88 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
4520 mmLength4600 mm
1760 mmWidth1690 mm
1430 mmHeight1465 mm
1240 KgWeight1230 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Fiat Croma and 1994 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…