DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 626 vs 2002 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
626ModelZ3
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationBMW Z3
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
208 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
136 HPPower118 HP
181 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank51 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationBMW Z3
4574 mmLength4050 mm
1710 mmWidth1740 mm
1430 mmHeight1288 mm
1250 KgWeight1220 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 626 and 2002 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…