DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZR vs 2002 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 626
MGMakeMazda
ZRModel626
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 626
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
185 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
113 HPPower136 HP
260 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 626
4011 mmLength4574 mm
1690 mmWidth1710 mm
1400 mmHeight1430 mm
1155 KgWeight1250 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZR and 2002 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…