DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 626
RoverMakeMazda
25Model626
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 626
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
185 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
113 HPPower136 HP
260 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 626
3990 mmLength4574 mm
1688 mmWidth1710 mm
1419 mmHeight1430 mm
1130 KgWeight1250 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 25 and 2002 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…