E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 626 vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationMG ZS
MazdaMakeMG
626ModelZS
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationMG ZS
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
208 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower113 HP
181 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationMG ZS
4574 mmLength4520 mm
1710 mmWidth1700 mm
1430 mmHeight1390 mm
1250 KgWeight1225 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 626 and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2002 Mercedes-Benz VaneoVS2002 Mazda 626Mercedes-Benz Vaneo vs Mazda 6262002 and 2002 model years2002 BMW Z3VS2002 Mazda 626BMW Z3 vs Mazda 6262002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVS2002 Mazda 626MG ZR vs Mazda 6262002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVS2002 Mazda 626MG ZS vs Mazda 6262002 and 2002 model years2002 Rover 25VS2002 Mazda 626Rover 25 vs Mazda 6262002 and 2002 model years

Comments are loading…