2000 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.0 (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Laguna
Renault Laguna 2.0 (B56C/H/N) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
MazdaMakeRenault
626ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower113 HP
170 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank66 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
4574 mmLength4508 mm
1710 mmWidth1752 mm
1430 mmHeight1432 mm
1185 KgWeight1255 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…