DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
LagunaModel626
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
113 HPPower115 HP
168 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4508 mmLength4574 mm
1752 mmWidth1710 mm
1432 mmHeight1430 mm
1255 KgWeight1185 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…